Michael Bennett v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC
MICHAEL T. BENNETT |
MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT, LLC |
19-10522 |
February 12, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Michael T. Bennett v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Mary Grace Gallagher for Marvel Entertainment, LLC and Jason Demian Rosenberg for Marvel Entertainment, LLC. [19-10522] (ECF: Mary Gallagher) [Entered: 03/13/2019 02:15 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Mary Grace Gallagher for Appellee Marvel Entertainment, LLC. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-10522] (ECF: Mary Gallagher) [Entered: 03/13/2019 02:19 PM] |
ORDER: Appellant's "Motion for Continuance for Case" construed as a motion for extension of time for filing the initial brief is GRANTED. Appellant's brief is due on April 24, 2019, with the appendix due seven (7) days later. [ # 8711415-2 ] ELB [Entered: 03/11/2019 04:00 PM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Michael T. Bennett. [Entered: 03/11/2019 10:08 AM] |
"MOTION for continuance" construed as a motion for extension of time to file appellant's brief to 04/24/2019 filed by Appellant Michael T. Bennett. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8711415-1] [Entered: 03/05/2019 02:55 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Michael T. Bennett. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 02/28/2019 12:01 PM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Michael T. Bennett on 02/08/2019. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 03/25/2019. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/26/2019 as to Appellant Michael T. Bennett. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 03/12/2019 as to Appellee Marvel Entertainment, LLC. [Entered: 02/14/2019 01:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Michael Bennett v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: MICHAEL T. BENNETT | |
Represented By: | Michael T. Bennett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT, LLC | |
Represented By: | Mary Grace Gallagher |
Represented By: | Jason Demian Rosenberg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.