Robert Otto, et al v. City of Boca Raton, Florida, et al
SERVICE and EQUALITY FLORIDA INSTITUTE, INC. |
JULIE H. HAMILTON and ROBERT W. OTTO |
CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLORIDA and COUNTY OF PALM BEACH, FL |
19-10604 |
February 14, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Otto v. City of Boca Raton |
Robert W. Otto, et al. v. City of Boca Raton, Florida, et al. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Received paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellants Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto. [Entered: 04/12/2019 09:21 AM] |
Appellant's brief filed by Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto. [19-10604] (ECF: Roger Gannam) [Entered: 04/09/2019 11:49 PM] |
TIME SENSITIVE MOTION for extension of time to file appellant's brief to 04/16/2019, to expedite ruling on a motion filed by Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto. Motion is Unopposed. [8737421-1] [19-10604] (ECF: Roger Gannam) [Entered: 04/04/2019 02:37 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Eric S. Kay for City of Boca Raton. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-10604] (ECF: Eric Kay) [Entered: 03/22/2019 09:26 AM] |
Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Roger K. Gannam for Appellants Robert W. Otto and Julie H. Hamilton. Appellants brief due on 04/09/2019 as to Appellants Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto. Appendix due on 04/16/2019. [Entered: 03/20/2019 11:38 AM] |
ORDER: Motion to file excess words/pages filed by Appellants Robert W. Otto and Julie H. Hamilton is GRANTED. [ # 8718851-2 ] EEC [Entered: 03/19/2019 03:11 PM] |
TIME SENSITIVE MOTION for excess words/pages filed by Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto. Opposing Counsel takes no Position. [8718851-1] [19-10604] (ECF: Roger Gannam) [Entered: 03/13/2019 03:32 PM] |
ORDER: Roger K. Gannam is permitted to appear pro hac vice in this appeal, representing the Appellants. EEC [Entered: 03/12/2019 12:27 PM] |
ORDER: Appellants Motion to Expedite Appeal is DENIED. [ # 8701837-2 ]; [ # 8701837-3 ]; [ # 8701837-4 ]; [ # 8701837-5 ] CRW [Entered: 03/07/2019 08:41 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Edward G. Guedes for City of Boca Raton [19-10604] (ECF: Edward Guedes) [Entered: 03/04/2019 02:02 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-10604] (ECF: Helene Hvizd) [Entered: 03/04/2019 12:02 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Eric S. Kay for City of Boca [19-10604] (ECF: Eric Kay) [Entered: 03/04/2019 02:21 PM] |
RESPONSE to Motion filed by Appellants Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto [ # 8701837-2 ], Motion filed by Appellants Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto [ # 8701837-3 ], Motion filed by Appellants Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto [ # 8701837-4 ], Motion filed by Appellants Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto [ # 8701837-5 ] filed by Attorney Daniel Lawrence Abbott for Appellee City of Boca Raton, Florida. [19-10604] (ECF: Daniel Abbott) [Entered: 03/04/2019 05:35 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jamie A. Cole for Appellee [19-10604] (ECF: Jamie Cole) [Entered: 03/04/2019 12:00 PM] |
RESPONSE to Motion to expedite filed by Appellants Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto [ # 8701837-2 ], Motion to expedite briefing filed by Appellants Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto [ # 8701837-3 ], Motion to expedite oral argument filed by Appellants Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto [ # 8701837-4 ], Motion to expedite disposition filed by Appellants Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto [ # 8701837-5 ] filed by Attorney Helene Catherine Hvizd for Appellee County of Palm Beach, FL. [19-10604] (ECF: Helene Hvizd) [Entered: 03/04/2019 04:39 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Helene C. Hvizd for County of Palm Beach [19-10604] (ECF: Helene Hvizd) [Entered: 03/01/2019 01:34 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Aaron C. Dunlap for Equality Florida Institute, Inc. (non-party) [19-10604] (ECF: Aaron Dunlap) [Entered: 03/01/2019 12:18 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jennifer A. Yasko for Equality Florida Institute, Inc. (not Party) [19-10604] (ECF: Jennifer Yasko) [Entered: 03/01/2019 12:01 PM] |
Appearance of counsel form has not been processed. According to our records, Roger K. Gannam for Robert W. Otto and Julie H. Hamilton is not a member of the Eleventh Circuit bar. The appearance of counsel form has not been processed allowing fourteen days to complete and return the required application for admission. [Entered: 02/28/2019 09:18 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Roger K. Gannam for Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto. [19-10604] (ECF: Roger Gannam) [Entered: 02/27/2019 04:11 PM] |
Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Roger K. Gannam for Appellants Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto. [19-10604] (ECF: Roger Gannam) [Entered: 02/27/2019 04:12 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Roger K. Gannam for Appellants Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-10604] (ECF: Roger Gannam) [Entered: 02/27/2019 04:24 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Anne Reilly Flanigan for City of Boca Raton, Florida. [19-10604] (ECF: Anne Flanigan) [Entered: 02/25/2019 12:39 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Daniel Lawrence Abbott for City of Boca Raton, Florida. [19-10604] (ECF: Daniel Abbott) [Entered: 02/25/2019 02:39 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Horatio Gabriel Mihet for Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto. [19-10604] (ECF: Horatio Mihet) [Entered: 02/22/2019 10:15 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Stacey K. Sutton for Equality Florida Institute, Inc. [19-10604] (ECF: Stacey Sutton) [Entered: 02/22/2019 08:28 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Sylvia H. Walbolt for Equality Florida Institute, Inc. [19-10604] (ECF: Sylvia Walbolt) [Entered: 02/22/2019 10:31 AM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Horatio Gabriel Mihet for Appellants Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [19-10604] (ECF: Horatio Mihet) [Entered: 02/22/2019 10:31 AM] |
Briefing Notice issued to Appellants Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto. The appellant's brief is due on or before 03/26/2019. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 02/22/2019 01:22 PM] |
TIME SENSITIVE MOTION to expedite, to expedite briefing, to expedite oral argument, to expedite disposition filed by Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto. Motion is Opposed. [8701837-1] [19-10604] (ECF: Horatio Mihet) [Entered: 02/22/2019 11:20 AM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto on 02/13/2019. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/28/2019 as to Appellant Julie H. Hamilton. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 03/14/2019 as to Appellee City of Boca Raton, Florida [Entered: 02/21/2019 04:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.