Derrick Robinson v. Scott Crickmar, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: DERRICK EDWARD ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee: SHAWN EMMONS, SCOTT CRICKMAR and GREGORY DOZIER
Case Number: 19-10666
Filed: February 21, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2019 USDC Order denying motion to reconsider denial of motion for IFP; affirms appellant to be 3 strikes and is required to pay the full filing fee pursuant to 1915(g). Filed on 03/26/2019. Docket Entry 17. [Entered: 04/19/2019 10:02 AM]
March 18, 2019 Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Derrick Edward Robinson. [Entered: 03/19/2019 12:32 PM]
March 11, 2019 RETURNED UNFILED: Appellant's premature brief filed by Derrick Edward Robinson is returned unfiled because it is not in compliance with the rules and the brief is not due yet. The brief requires a table of citation. See enclosed blue instructions for proper filing. Please do not send a brief until a briefing schedule issues. [Entered: 03/11/2019 12:32 PM]
March 8, 2019 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Derrick Edward Robinson. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 03/08/2019 09:44 AM]
March 7, 2019 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Derrick Edward Robinson. [Entered: 03/08/2019 04:20 PM]
March 7, 2019 MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Derrick Edward Robinson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8715210-1] [Entered: 03/08/2019 04:21 PM]
February 21, 2019 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Derrick Edward Robinson on 02/21/2019. Fee Status: PLRA 3 Strikes. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 02/25/2019 09:23 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Derrick Robinson v. Scott Crickmar, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DERRICK EDWARD ROBINSON
Represented By: Derrick Edward Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SHAWN EMMONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SCOTT CRICKMAR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GREGORY DOZIER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?