Michael Burgess v. USA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
MICHAEL FRANK BURGESS |
19-10708 |
February 25, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Michael Frank Burgess was filed on 03/28/2019. Docket Entry 59. [Entered: 03/29/2019 12:22 PM] |
ORDER: Motion to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant Michael Frank Burgess is GRANTED by clerk. [ # 8726710-2 ] [Entered: 03/26/2019 07:34 AM] |
MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant Michael Frank Burgess. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8726710-1] [Entered: 03/25/2019 08:09 AM] |
USDC MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellant Michael Frank Burgess was filed on 03/21/2019. Docket Entry 55. [Entered: 03/25/2019 11:38 AM] |
ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Michael Frank Burgess failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 03/18/2019 10:56 AM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to R. Christopher Lim for Michael Frank Burgess and Ovide Val for Michael Frank Burgess. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 03/12/2019 10:59 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Roberta Josephina Bodnar for United States. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-10708] (ECF: Roberta Bodnar) [Entered: 03/11/2019 03:10 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Roberta Josephina Bodnar for United States [19-10708] (ECF: Roberta Bodnar) [Entered: 03/11/2019 03:04 PM] |
Removed from case: Attorney Ovide Val for Appellant Michael Frank Burgess in 19-10708. [Entered: 03/05/2019 09:26 AM] |
USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Michael Frank Burgess was filed on 02/07/2019. Docket Entry 50. [Entered: 02/25/2019 01:50 PM] |
HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Michael Frank Burgess on 02/22/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 02/25/2019 01:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Michael Burgess v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Roberta Josephina Bodnar |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: MICHAEL FRANK BURGESS | |
Represented By: | Ovide Val |
Represented By: | R. Christopher Lim |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.