Ayesha Akbar v. Commissioner, Social Security
| COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| AYESHA AKBAR |
| 19-10732 |
| February 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Ayesha Akbar v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Ayesha Akbar. [Entered: 04/08/2019 12:57 PM] |
| MOTION to consolidate appeals 19-10732, 19-10733 filed by Appellant Ayesha Akbar in 19-10732, 19-10733. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8739586-1] [19-10732, 19-10733] [Entered: 04/08/2019 12:55 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Richard H. Winters for Appellee [19-10732] (ECF: Richard Winters) [Entered: 03/27/2019 02:43 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Brian C. Huberty for Commissioner, Social Security Administration Attorney Brian C. Huberty for Appellee Commissioner, Social Security Administration. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-10732] (ECF: Brian Huberty) [Entered: 03/26/2019 12:55 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Brian Huberty for SSA [19-10732] (ECF: Brian Huberty) [Entered: 03/22/2019 09:37 AM] |
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Ayesha Akbar. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8718188-1] [Entered: 03/13/2019 10:59 AM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Ayesha Akbar. [Entered: 03/13/2019 10:53 AM] |
| USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Ayesha Akbar was filed on 02/27/2019. Docket Entry 35. [Entered: 03/04/2019 03:58 PM] |
| USDC MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellant Ayesha Akbar was filed on 02/25/2019. Docket Entry 33. [Entered: 02/27/2019 11:40 AM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Ayesha Akbar on 02/25/2019. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: APPLICATION to Appeal in forma pauperis. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 03/12/2019 as to Appellant Ayesha Akbar. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 03/26/2019 as to Appellee Commissioner, Social Security Administration [Entered: 02/27/2019 11:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ayesha Akbar v. Commissioner, Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION | |
| Represented By: | Richard Harrison Winters |
| Represented By: | Brian C. Huberty |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: AYESHA AKBAR | |
| Represented By: | Ayesha Akbar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
