In re: Ervin Earl
In re: ERVIN BERNARD EARL |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
19-10786 |
March 4, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER: Motion for leave to file successive motion to vacate sentence filed by Petitioner Ervin Bernard Earl is DENIED. [ # 8711237-2 ] SM, WHP and KCN [Entered: 03/19/2019 01:16 PM] |
Public Communication: This is a Johnson-based 2255 application to which the government's standing response applies. [Entered: 03/05/2019 04:28 PM] |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. EMERGENCY Application for leave to file successive motion to vacate sentence filed by Petitioner Ervin Bernard Earl. Served 02/28/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Required [Entered: 03/05/2019 12:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Ervin Earl | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: ERVIN BERNARD EARL | |
Represented By: | Ervin Bernard Earl |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Undetermined: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.