Daniel Getz v. Viasat Inc.
Other: SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellee: DANIEL GETZ, individually and on behalf of al others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: VIASAT INC., a California Corporation d.b.a. Exede Internet
Case Number: 19-11117
Filed: March 22, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER: On its own motion, the court DISMISSES the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.; Motion to hold in abeyance filed by Appellant Viasat Inc. is DENIED. [ # 8737054-2 ] SM, RSR and KCN [Entered: 05/13/2019 12:14 PM]
May 9, 2019 USDC order: Defendants DIRECTV, LLC and Viasat, lnc.'s M otion and Incorporated M emorandum f Law in jupport of Thelr Motion to Continue Entry of a Default o Judgment Against Co-Defendant Accelerated Teclmology Services Group, LLC EECF No. 61q is GR ANTED. Defendants as to Appellant Viasat Inc. was filed on 05/08/2019. Docket Entry 65. [Entered: 05/09/2019 01:07 PM]
April 25, 2019 Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Elliot H. Scherker for Appellant Viasat Inc.. Appellants brief due on 05/15/2019 as to Appellant Viasat Inc.. Appendix due on 05/22/2019 as to Appellant Viasat Inc.. [Entered: 04/25/2019 11:43 AM]
April 18, 2019 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Joshua Robert Levine for Appellee Daniel Getz. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11117] (ECF: Joshua Levine) [Entered: 04/18/2019 04:22 PM]
April 4, 2019 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Brigid Finerty Cech Samole for Appellant Viasat Inc.. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11117] (ECF: Brigid Cech Samole) [Entered: 04/04/2019 11:12 AM]
April 4, 2019 MOTION to hold appeal in abeyance filed by Viasat Inc.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [8737054-1] [19-11117] (ECF: Brigid Cech Samole) [Entered: 04/04/2019 11:22 AM]
March 29, 2019 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Joshua Robert Levine for Daniel Getz. [19-11117] (ECF: Joshua Levine) [Entered: 03/29/2019 03:37 PM]
March 28, 2019 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Ian C. Ballon for Appellant [19-11117] (ECF: Ian Ballon) [Entered: 03/28/2019 05:34 PM]
March 28, 2019 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Elliot H. Scherker for Appellant [19-11117] (ECF: Elliot Scherker) [Entered: 03/28/2019 03:51 PM]
March 28, 2019 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Brigid Finerty Cech Samole for Viasat Inc.. [19-11117] (ECF: Brigid Cech Samole) [Entered: 03/28/2019 03:47 PM]
March 28, 2019 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Katherine M. Clemente for Appellant [19-11117] (ECF: Katherine Clemente) [Entered: 03/28/2019 04:02 PM]
March 28, 2019 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Brigid Finerty Cech Samole for Appellant Viasat Inc.. [19-11117] (ECF: Brigid Cech Samole) [Entered: 03/28/2019 04:05 PM]
March 28, 2019 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Brigid Finerty Cech Samole for Appellant Viasat Inc.. Transcript(s) ordered. [19-11117] (ECF: Brigid Cech Samole) [Entered: 03/28/2019 05:22 PM]
March 22, 2019 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Viasat Inc. on 03/22/2019. Fee Status: Fee Paid. USDC motion pending: Amended Motion to continue entry of a default judgment. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 05/01/2019. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 04/05/2019 as to Appellant Viasat Inc.. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 04/19/2019 as to Appellee Daniel Getz [Entered: 03/27/2019 03:47 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Daniel Getz v. Viasat Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Other: SERVICE
Represented By: Kyle J. Steinmetz
Represented By: Scott A. Markowitz
Represented By: Hans J. Germann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: DANIEL GETZ, individually and on behalf of al others similarly situated
Represented By: Joshua Robert Levine
Represented By: Scott Adam Edelsberg
Represented By: Andrew John Shamis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: VIASAT INC., a California Corporation d.b.a. Exede Internet
Represented By: Brigid Finerty Cech Samole
Represented By: Katherine Marie Clemente
Represented By: Ian C. Ballon
Represented By: Colin Ward
Represented By: Elliot H. Scherker
Represented By: Ian M. Ross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?