DeMarcus Williams v. Darryl McMillian
| BULLOCK CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DARRYL MCMILLIAN and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| DEMARCUS WILLIAMS |
| 19-11150 |
| March 27, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: On its own motion, the court DISMISSES the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. GBT, SM and BCG [Entered: 05/22/2019 11:45 AM]
|
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant DeMarcus Williams. [Entered: 04/23/2019 02:19 PM] |
| USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 04/12/2019. Docket Entry 39. [Entered: 04/15/2019 10:29 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to DeMarcus Williams. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 04/11/2019 09:03 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party DeMarcus Williams. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 04/09/2019 08:38 AM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant DeMarcus Williams on 03/27/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 03/29/2019 09:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
