David Gould v. USA
| DAVID GOULD |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-11190 |
| March 29, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: On its own motion, the court remands this appeal to the District Court for the limited purpose of determining whether Mr. Gould is entitled to a reopening of the appeal period under Rule 4(a)(6). Upon making its decision, the district court shall return the case, as supplemented, to this Court for further proceedings. CRW and JP [Entered: 05/22/2019 12:14 PM]
|
| MOTION Expand the Record filed by Appellant David Gould. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8767287-1] [Entered: 05/08/2019 11:57 AM] |
| Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant David Gould. [Entered: 05/03/2019 11:28 AM] |
| RETURNED UNFILED: Motion to Compel the Govt. filed by David Gould is returned unfiled. [Entered: 04/19/2019 04:32 PM] |
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant David Gould. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8751262-1] [Entered: 04/19/2019 04:27 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant David Gould. [Entered: 04/19/2019 04:25 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to David Gould. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 04/15/2019 03:01 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney James C. Stuchell for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11190] (ECF: James Stuchell) [Entered: 04/11/2019 10:59 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by James C. Stuchell U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Georgia for USA. [19-11190] (ECF: James Stuchell) [Entered: 04/09/2019 09:14 AM] |
| USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant David Gould was filed on 01/14/2019. Docket Entry 24. [Entered: 04/01/2019 12:50 PM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant David Gould on 03/28/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 04/01/2019 12:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: David Gould v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: DAVID GOULD | |
| Represented By: | David Gould |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Georgia |
| Represented By: | James C. Stuchell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
