Arthur Clark v. Lynn Sheffield, et al
| LYNN SHEFFIELD, Sheriff, PETER WROBEL and TOMMY BARRENTINE |
| ARTHUR LAWTON CLARK |
| 19-11230 |
| April 2, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Arthur Lawton Clark v. Lynne Sheffield, Sheriff, et al |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: The motion for extension of time to and including May 28, 2019 in which to file Appellants brief is GRANTED. [ # 8768527-2 ] SM [Entered: 05/16/2019 07:39 AM]
|
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Arthur Lawton Clark. No hearings. [Entered: 05/10/2019 11:31 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Jason C. Waymire for Tommy Barrentine and Lynn Sheffield. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/01/2019 11:36 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Jason C. Waymire for Appellees Tommy Barrentine and Lynn Sheffield. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11230] (ECF: Jason Waymire) [Entered: 05/01/2019 08:45 PM] |
| MOTION for 14 day extension of time to file appellant's brief to 05/28/2019 filed by Appellant Arthur Lawton Clark. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8768527-1] [Entered: 05/09/2019 11:58 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11230] (ECF: James Banks) [Entered: 04/29/2019 04:36 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Arthur Lawton Clark. [Entered: 05/03/2019 05:49 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Arthur Lawton Clark. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 04/18/2019 02:47 PM] |
| Appellate fee was paid on 04/16/2019 as to Appellant Arthur Lawton Clark. [Entered: 04/17/2019 04:26 PM] |
| Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Arthur Lawton Clark. The appellant's brief is due on or before 05/13/2019. [Entered: 04/17/2019 04:34 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by J. Gabriel Banks for Peter Wrobel, MD [19-11230] (ECF: James Banks) [Entered: 04/15/2019 09:32 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jason C. Waymire for Tommy Barrentine and Lynn Sheffield. [19-11230] (ECF: Jason Waymire) [Entered: 04/04/2019 02:42 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Arthur Lawton Clark on 04/02/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 04/04/2019 12:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
