USA v. Michael Hendrix
| MICHAEL HENDRIX |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-11308 |
| April 8, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Received CORRECTED paper copies of EAppendix filed by Appellant Michael Hendrix. 1 VOLUMES - 2 COPIES. All defieciencies have been corrected. [Entered: 05/20/2019 04:16 PM] |
| SEALED PSI filed by Attorney Matthew K. Hube for Appellant Michael Hendrix. [Entered: 05/21/2019 02:20 PM] |
| Returned Mail was received for Attorney Matthew K. Hube for Appellant Michael Hendrix. Address has been verified and updated, and mail has been re-sent. IN RE: Notice of Motion to Withdraw Pursuant to Anders [Entered: 05/20/2019 03:16 PM] |
| Corrected Appendix filed [1 VOLUMES] by Appellant Michael Hendrix. [19-11308] (ECF: Matthew Hube) [Entered: 05/15/2019 02:56 PM] |
| Notice of deficient Appellant appendix filed by Attorney Matthew K. Hube for Appellant Michael Hendrix. Deficiencies: Missing PSI. [Entered: 05/14/2019 10:56 AM] |
| Received paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellant Michael Hendrix. [Entered: 05/14/2019 10:54 AM] |
| Received paper copies of EAppendix filed by Appellant Michael Hendrix. 1 VOLUMES - 2 COPIES [Entered: 05/14/2019 10:55 AM] |
| Appellant's Anders Brief filed by Appellant Michael Hendrix. [19-11308] (ECF: Matthew Hube) [Entered: 05/07/2019 02:56 PM] |
| Appendix filed [1 VOLUMES] by Appellant Michael Hendrix. [19-11308] ***SEE CORRECTED APPENDIX DATED 5/15/19***--[Edited 05/20/2019 by MSB] (ECF: Matthew Hube) [Entered: 05/07/2019 02:58 PM] |
| MOTION to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney Matthew K Hube for Appellant Michael Hendrix. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8766251-1] [19-11308] (ECF: Matthew Hube) [Entered: 05/07/2019 02:52 PM] |
| Letter regarding inactive status and bar membership renewal issued to attorney Attorney Matthew K Hube for Appellant Michael Hendrix. [Entered: 04/30/2019 04:02 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney James C. Stuchell for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11308] (ECF: James Stuchell) [Entered: 04/24/2019 03:26 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Matthew K Hube for Appellant Michael Hendrix. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11308]--[Edited 05/14/2019 by BWH]--[Edited 05/14/2019 by BWH] (ECF: Matthew Hube) [Entered: 04/24/2019 04:05 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Matthew Hube for Michael Hendrix. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 04/23/2019 09:32 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Debbie Gilbert, Filer: Michael Hendrix, Dt. all Trans. Filed: 04/19/2019, Proceeding Type and Date: Final Revocation Hearing 04/03/2019. [Entered: 04/19/2019 11:04 AM] |
| EXPEDITED; Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Michael Hendrix. The appellant's brief is due on or before 05/10/2019. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Appellee's brief is due on or before 05/24/2019. NO EXTENSIONS ALLOWED [Entered: 04/19/2019 12:22 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by James C. Stuchell U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Georgia for USA. [19-11308] (ECF: James Stuchell) [Entered: 04/15/2019 01:40 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Michael Hendrix, Court Reporter: Debbie Gilbert, Proceeding Type and Date: Final Revocation Hearing 04/03/2019. [Entered: 04/10/2019 04:05 PM] |
| CJA appointment issued by this court to Attorney Matthew K Hube for Appellant Michael Hendrix. [Entered: 04/09/2019 12:32 PM] |
| CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Michael Hendrix on 04/08/2019. Fee Status: IFP Granted. [Entered: 04/09/2019 12:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Michael Hendrix | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: MICHAEL HENDRIX | |
| Represented By: | Matthew K. Hube |
| Represented By: | Michael Hendrix |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Georgia |
| Represented By: | James C. Stuchell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
