Timothy Hamilton v. Schneider National Carriers
Defendant / Appellee: SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant: TIMOTHY HAMILTON
Case Number: 19-11322
Filed: April 8, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2019 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Timothy Hamilton. The appellant's brief is due on or before 06/24/2019. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 05/15/2019 02:22 PM]
May 15, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER: Motion to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant Timothy Hamilton is GRANTED by clerk. [ # 8761724-2 ] [Entered: 05/15/2019 07:40 AM]
May 6, 2019 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by [19-11322] (ECF: Ian Smith) [Entered: 05/06/2019 01:37 PM]
May 6, 2019 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Ian Edward Smith, Sr. for Appellant Timothy Hamilton. No hearings. [19-11322] (ECF: Ian Smith) [Entered: 05/06/2019 04:34 PM]
May 6, 2019 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Ian Edward Smith, Sr. for Appellant Timothy Hamilton. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11322] (ECF: Ian Smith) [Entered: 05/06/2019 04:20 PM]
May 6, 2019 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Ian Edward Smith, Sr. for Appellant Timothy Hamilton. [19-11322] (ECF: Ian Smith) [Entered: 05/06/2019 03:58 PM]
May 6, 2019 Response filed by Ian Edward Smith, Sr. for Timothy Hamilton pursuant to court order dated 04/30/2019. [19-11322] (ECF: Ian Smith) [Entered: 05/06/2019 03:56 PM]
May 6, 2019 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by [19-11322] (ECF: Ian Smith) [Entered: 05/06/2019 01:38 PM]
May 6, 2019 RETURNED UNFILED: Various documents filed by Amanda A. Farahany for Timothy Hamilton, Ian Edward Smith, Sr. for Timothy Hamilton and Benjamin A. Stark for Timothy Hamilton is returned unfiled because each of these documents should be filed separately. [Entered: 05/06/2019 12:54 PM]
May 6, 2019 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Benjamin A. Stark for Timothy Hamilton Ian Edward Smith, Sr. for Timothy Hamilton. [19-11322] (ECF: Ian Smith) [Entered: 05/06/2019 11:31 AM]
May 2, 2019 Motion to reinstate filed by Attorney Ian Edward Smith, Sr. for Appellant Timothy Hamilton have/has been conditional filed. Document will be returned if appearance of counsel has not been received within 14 days. [Entered: 05/02/2019 07:54 AM]
May 1, 2019 MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Timothy Hamilton. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [8761724-1] [19-11322] (ECF: Ian Smith) [Entered: 05/01/2019 10:46 PM]
April 30, 2019 ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Timothy Hamilton failed to file a Transcript Order Form within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 04/30/2019 08:13 AM]
April 24, 2019 Amanda A. Farahany for Appellant Timothy Hamilton and Ian Edward Smith, Sr. for Appellant Timothy Hamilton has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required Civil Appeal Statement has been received. A motion to file the Civil Appeal Statement out of time should also be filed at this time. [Entered: 04/24/2019 08:17 AM]
April 23, 2019 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Amanda A. Farahany for Timothy Hamilton and Ian Edward Smith, Sr. for Timothy Hamilton. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 04/23/2019 07:44 AM]
April 9, 2019 Appellate fee was paid on 04/08/2019 as to Appellant Timothy Hamilton. [Entered: 04/09/2019 02:49 PM]
April 8, 2019 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Timothy Hamilton on 04/08/2019. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 04/22/2019 as to Appellant Timothy Hamilton. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/06/2019 as to Appellee Schneider National Carriers, Inc. [Entered: 04/09/2019 02:47 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Timothy Hamilton v. Schneider National Carriers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS, INC.
Represented By: Chen G. Ni
Represented By: Brennan W. Bolt
Represented By: Peter A. Milianti
Represented By: David D. Leishman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: TIMOTHY HAMILTON
Represented By: Ian Edward Smith Sr.
Represented By: Amanda A. Farahany
Represented By: Benjamin A. Stark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?