Serless West v. City of Albany, Georgia, et al
| SERLESS WEST |
| CITY OF ALBANY, GEORGIA, THOMAS BERRY, in his individual capacity and JOELLEN BROPHY, in her individual capacity |
| 19-11418 |
| April 15, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Serless West v. City of Albany, Georgia, et al. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to William Drummond Deveney for City of Albany, Georgia, Thomas Berry and Joellen Brophy. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/08/2019 02:39 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Richard Read Gignilliat for Thomas Berry, Joellen Brophy and City of Albany, Georgia. [19-11418] (ECF: Richard Gignilliat) [Entered: 05/07/2019 04:14 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by William Drummond Deveney for Thomas Berry, Joellen Brophy and City of Albany, Georgia. [19-11418] (ECF: William Deveney) [Entered: 05/07/2019 04:19 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney William Drummond Deveney for Appellees Thomas Berry, Joellen Brophy and City of Albany, Georgia. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11418] (ECF: William Deveney) [Entered: 05/07/2019 04:37 PM] |
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney LaTonya Nix Wiley for Appellant Serless West. [19-11418] (ECF: LaTonya Wiley) [Entered: 05/01/2019 03:21 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney LaTonya Nix Wiley for Appellant Serless West. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11418] (ECF: LaTonya Wiley) [Entered: 05/01/2019 03:19 PM] |
| Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Serless West. The appellant's brief is due on or before 05/28/2019. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 05/01/2019 02:54 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney LaTonya Nix Wiley for Appellant Serless West. No hearings. [Entered: 05/01/2019 02:37 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by LaTonya Nix Wiley for Serless West. [19-11418] (ECF: LaTonya Wiley) [Entered: 04/26/2019 06:11 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney LaTonya Nix Wiley for Appellant Serless West. No hearings. [19-11418] (ECF: LaTonya Wiley) [Entered: 04/26/2019 06:16 PM] |
| Appellate fee was paid on 04/12/2019 as to Appellant Serless West. [Entered: 04/18/2019 10:20 AM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Serless West on 04/12/2019. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/02/2019 as to Appellant Serless West. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/13/2019 as to Appellee Thomas Berry [Entered: 04/18/2019 10:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
