Charles Gregory Clark v. Commissioner, Alabama DOC
Petitioner / Appellant: CHARLES GREGORY CLARK
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Case Number: 19-11443
Filed: April 11, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 25, 2021 Summary Clark v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2019 Record on Appeal filed. Pleadings, [10 Volumes of Pleadings (Administrative Record, Vol.35 (See Doc.49)(Exhibits consisting of a CD,Photographs & Transcript in Exhibit Folder) - Total Boxes 2] [Entered: 06/03/2019 10:20 AM]
June 3, 2019 Certificate of Readiness filed as to Appellant Charles Gregory Clark. [10 Volumes of Pleadings (Administrative Record, Vol.35 (See Doc.49)(Exhibits consisting of a CD,Photographs & Transcript in Separate Folder) - Total Boxes 2] [Entered: 06/03/2019 10:01 AM]
May 29, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER: Motion to expand the certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Charles Gregory Clark is GRANTED as to the following issue: "Whether Alabama's capital sentencing scheme violates Clark's Sixth Amendment right to a jury determination of all facts necessary to impose a death sentence." In all other respects, the motion is DENIED. [ # 8758639-2 ] CRW [Entered: 05/29/2019 12:58 PM]
April 29, 2019 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by James Roy Houts for Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections. [19-11443] (ECF: James Houts) [Entered: 04/29/2019 12:43 PM]
April 29, 2019 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11443] (ECF: James Houts) [Entered: 04/29/2019 12:55 PM]
April 29, 2019 MOTION to expand the certificate of appealability filed by Charles Gregory Clark. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [8758639-1] [19-11443] (ECF: Matt Schulz) [Entered: 04/29/2019 03:40 PM]
April 29, 2019 The briefing schedule issued to Appellant Charles Gregory Clark is hereby rescinded for the following reason(s): Motion to Expand the Certificate of Appealability Filed.. When the above matter(s) is resolved, the clerk will issue a notice advising counsel and the parties of the new schedule for filing briefs in this appeal. [Entered: 04/29/2019 03:53 PM]
April 24, 2019 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Matt D. Schulz for Appellant Charles Gregory Clark. No hearings. [Entered: 04/24/2019 09:01 AM]
April 23, 2019 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Spencer Jay Hahn for Charles Gregory Clark. [19-11443] (ECF: Spencer Hahn) [Entered: 04/23/2019 03:34 PM]
April 23, 2019 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Matt D. Schulz for Appellant Charles Gregory Clark. No hearings. [19-11443] (ECF: Matt Schulz) [Entered: 04/23/2019 03:15 PM]
April 23, 2019 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Matt D. Schulz for Charles Gregory Clark. [19-11443] (ECF: Matt Schulz) [Entered: 04/23/2019 03:12 PM]
April 23, 2019 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Matt D. Schulz for Appellant Charles Gregory Clark. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11443] (ECF: Matt Schulz) [Entered: 04/23/2019 03:24 PM]
April 11, 2019 USDC Order Granting appointment of counsel Matt David Schulz and Spencer J. Hahn, members of the Capital Habeas Unit of the Federal Defenders Office are appointed as to Appellant Charles Gregory Clark was filed on 09/06/2016. Docket Entry 6. [Entered: 04/16/2019 03:33 PM]
April 11, 2019 USDC Order re COA - Granted with respect to his ineffective assistance physical restraints claim and is denied in all other respects as to Appellant Charles Gregory Clark was filed on 03/11/2019. Docket Entry 61. [Entered: 04/16/2019 03:39 PM]
April 11, 2019 DEATH PENALTY APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Spencer Jay Hahn for Appellant Charles Gregory Clark and Matt D. Schulz for Appellant Charles Gregory Clark on 04/10/2019. Appellant brief due 40 days from 04/11/2019. Fee Status: IFP Granted. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 04/16/2019 03:01 PM]
April 11, 2019 USDC order granting IFP as to Appellant Charles Gregory Clark was filed on 09/06/2016. Docket Entry 6. [Entered: 04/16/2019 03:23 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Charles Gregory Clark v. Commissioner, Alabama DOC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: CHARLES GREGORY CLARK
Represented By: Spencer Jay Hahn
Represented By: Matt D. Schulz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Luther J. Strange III
Represented By: James Roy Houts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?