Daryl Davis v. USA
DARYL DAVIS |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
19-11468 |
April 16, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER: Motion for extension to file motion for COA filed by Appellant Daryl Davis is GRANTED. [ # 8788323-2 ] COA due on 6/30/2019. SM [Entered: 06/10/2019 02:09 PM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file a Motion for Certificate of Appealability to 06/30/2019 filed by Appellant Daryl Davis. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8788323-1] [Entered: 05/31/2019 04:53 PM] |
USDC order granting IFP as to Appellant Daryl Davis was filed on 05/15/2019. Docket Entry 52. [Entered: 05/16/2019 02:32 PM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Daryl Davis. [Entered: 05/09/2019 01:07 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Daryl Davis. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/01/2019 04:13 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Robert Benjamin Cornell for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11468] (ECF: Robert Cornell) [Entered: 04/30/2019 11:19 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Robert B. Cornell for USA [19-11468] (ECF: Robert Cornell) [Entered: 04/29/2019 11:06 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Emily M. Smachetti for USA. [19-11468] (ECF: Emily Smachetti) [Entered: 04/26/2019 11:48 AM] |
USDC order denying without prejudice, IFP as to Appellant Daryl Davis was filed on 04/24/2019. Docket Entry 49. Petitioner is directed to file an amended motion on or before May 13, 2019. [Entered: 04/25/2019 02:55 PM] |
USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Daryl Davis was filed on 02/28/2019. Docket Entry 44. [Entered: 04/18/2019 02:56 PM] |
USDC MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellant Daryl Davis was filed on 04/15/2019. Docket Entry 47. [Entered: 04/18/2019 02:57 PM] |
HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Daryl Davis on 04/15/2019 USDC motion pending: Motion for IFP filed on 04/15/2019. DE# 47. Fee Status: IFP Pending. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 04/18/2019 02:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Daryl Davis v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: DARYL DAVIS | |
Represented By: | Daryl Davis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Emily M. Smachetti |
Represented By: | Robert Benjamin Cornell |
Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.