Cecelia King v. Jennifer Bencie, et al
LYNNE DRAWDY, SUSAN DOEBERLE, JENNIFER BENCIE and EDDIE RODRIGUEZ |
CECELIA N. KING |
19-11503 |
April 17, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Cecilia N. King v. Jennifer Bencie, et al. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER: Motion for extension to file appellant brief filed by Appellant Cecelia N. King is GRANTED. [ # 8796053-2 ] Appellants brief due on 07/02/2019. WHP [Entered: 06/12/2019 12:43 PM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file appellant's brief to 07/02/2019 filed by Appellant Cecelia N. King. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8796053-1] [Entered: 06/11/2019 07:52 AM] |
ORDER: Plaintiff/Appellants Motion to File and Receive Notices and Orders Electronically is GRANTED, and Appellant may submit documents through the Courts electronic case filing system in this appeal. [ # 8765208-2 ] (See order for complete text). JP [Entered: 06/07/2019 08:03 AM] |
Response to Jurisdictional Question filed by Appellees Jennifer Bencie, Susan Doeberle, Lynne Drawdy and Eddie Rodriguez [19-11503] (ECF: Stephen Spaid) [Entered: 05/23/2019 03:30 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11503] (ECF: Stephen Spaid) [Entered: 05/15/2019 04:59 PM] |
JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Cecelia N. King. [Entered: 05/08/2019 03:12 PM] |
MOTION to file and receive notices and orders electronically filed by Appellant Cecelia N. King. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8765208-1] [Entered: 05/06/2019 03:55 PM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Cecelia N. King. [Entered: 05/06/2019 03:50 PM] |
Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Party Cecelia N. King. Appellant's brief is due on 06/11/2019. [Entered: 05/01/2019 01:37 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Cecelia N. King. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/02/2019 02:27 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Samuel Robert Mandelbaum for Jennifer Bencie, Susan Doeberle, Lynne Drawdy and Eddie Rodriguez. [19-11503] (ECF: Samuel Mandelbaum) [Entered: 05/01/2019 02:06 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Stephen A. Spaid for Jennifer Bencie, Susan Doeberle, Lynne Drawdy and Eddie Rodriguez. [19-11503] (ECF: Stephen Spaid) [Entered: 05/01/2019 04:01 PM] |
Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Cecelia N. King. The appellant's brief is due on or before 05/28/2019. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 04/29/2019 07:37 AM] |
Appellate fee was paid on 04/19/2019 as to Appellant Cecelia N. King. [Entered: 04/26/2019 04:20 PM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Cecelia N. King on 04/16/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/01/2019 as to Appellant Cecelia N. King. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/15/2019 as to Appellee Jennifer Bencie [Entered: 04/22/2019 09:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.