USA v. Joshua Nichols
Defendant / Appellant: JOSHUA THOMAS NICHOLS
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 19-11507
Filed: April 18, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2019 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Joshua T. Nichols, Court Reporter: Roy B. Isbell, Proceeding Type and Date: Plea Hearing 05/14/2018 , Sentencing 03/27/2019. [Entered: 06/10/2019 08:12 AM]
June 10, 2019 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Thomas Brian Walsh for Appellant Joshua Thomas Nichols. Transcript(s) ordered. [19-11507] (ECF: Thomas Walsh) [Entered: 06/08/2019 10:21 AM]
May 29, 2019 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Joshua Thomas Nichols. The appellant is hereby notified that upon expiration of 14 days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the default has been corrected. [Entered: 05/29/2019 07:29 AM]
May 28, 2019 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Thomas Brian Walsh for Appellant Joshua Thomas Nichols. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11507] (ECF: Thomas Walsh) [Entered: 05/28/2019 03:56 PM]
May 22, 2019 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Thomas Brian Walsh for Joshua Thomas Nichols. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/22/2019 10:56 AM]
May 16, 2019 Returned Mail was received for Appellant Joshua Thomas Nichols. Address has been verified and updated, and mail has been re-sent. IN RE: CJA Letter [Entered: 05/16/2019 02:21 PM]
May 7, 2019 CJA appointment issued by this court to Attorney Thomas Brian Walsh for Appellant Joshua Thomas Nichols. [Entered: 05/07/2019 09:31 AM]
May 7, 2019 USDC order Granting appointment of counsel as to Appellant Joshua Thomas Nichols was filed on 05/06/2019. Docket Entry. Added Attorney Attorney(s) Thomas Brian Walsh for party(s) Appellant Joshua Thomas Nichols, in case 19-11507. [Entered: 05/07/2019 09:31 AM]
May 7, 2019 USDC order Granting withdrawal of counsel as to Appellant Joshua Thomas Nichols was filed on 05/06/2019. Docket Entry 105. Counsel terminated: Attorney Gordon G. Armstrong III for Appellant Joshua Thomas Nichols in 19-11507. [Entered: 05/07/2019 09:28 AM]
May 3, 2019 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Gordon G. Armstrong, III for Joshua Thomas Nichols. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/03/2019 08:19 AM]
April 29, 2019 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Mr. Scott Alan Gray for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11507] (ECF: Scott Gray) [Entered: 04/29/2019 03:23 PM]
April 29, 2019 Returned Mail was received for Attorney Gordon G. Armstrong, III for Appellant Joshua Thomas Nichols. Cannot locate party. IN RE: Docketing and CJA letters [Entered: 05/03/2019 07:07 AM]
April 24, 2019 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Scott Gray for USA U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Alabama for USA. [19-11507] (ECF: Scott Gray) [Entered: 04/24/2019 05:43 PM]
April 22, 2019 CJA appointment issued by this court to Attorney Gordon G. Armstrong, III for Appellant Joshua Thomas Nichols. [Entered: 04/22/2019 12:04 PM]
April 18, 2019 CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Joshua Thomas Nichols on 04/12/2019. Fee Status: IFP Granted. [Entered: 04/22/2019 12:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Joshua Nichols
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: JOSHUA THOMAS NICHOLS
Represented By: Gordon G. Armstrong III
Represented By: Joshua Thomas Nichols
Represented By: Thomas Brian Walsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Scott Alan Gray
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Alabama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?