Packers Sanitation Services v. Occupational Safety and Health
PACKERS SANITATION SERVICES, INC. |
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION |
19-11537 |
April 23, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Packers Sanitation Services, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Labor |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[8800746-1] [19-11537]Reply to response filed by Petitioner Packers Sanitation Services, Inc..--[Edited 06/17/2019 by RAV] (ECF: Travis Vance) [Entered: 06/14/2019 03:22 PM] |
Notice of deficient Motion filed by Ronald Joseph Gottlieb for Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. Document does not contain a Certificate of Interested Persons. See 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-5. Counsel must file a corrected motion using the Amend, Correct or Supplement Motion event within 3 days. [Entered: 06/10/2019 11:04 AM] |
Amended Motion [ # 8783739-2 ] filed by Respondent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. [19-11537] (ECF: Ronald Gottlieb) [Entered: 06/10/2019 11:54 AM] |
RESPONSE to Motion to stay pending appeal filed by Petitioner Packers Sanitation Services, Inc. [ # 8783739-2 ] filed by Attorney Ronald Joseph Gottlieb for Respondent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. [19-11537] (ECF: Ronald Gottlieb) [Entered: 06/07/2019 02:56 PM] |
Briefing Notice issued to Petitioner Packers Sanitation Services, Inc.. The appellant's brief is due on or before 07/15/2019. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 06/05/2019 03:45 PM] |
Certified Agency List filed as to Respondent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. [Entered: 06/04/2019 11:32 AM] |
MOTION to stay pending appeal filed by Packers Sanitation Services, Inc.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [8783739-1] [19-11537] (ECF: Travis Vance) [Entered: 05/28/2019 01:41 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by R. Alexander Acosta, Secretary of Labor Attorney Ronald Joseph Gottlieb for Respondent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11537] (ECF: Ronald Gottlieb) [Entered: 05/15/2019 11:24 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Ronald J. Gottlieb for R. Alexander Acosta, Secretary of Labor [19-11537] (ECF: Ronald Gottlieb) [Entered: 05/08/2019 09:30 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Travis Wayne Vance for Petitioner Packers Sanitation Services, Inc.. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11537] (ECF: Travis Vance) [Entered: 05/07/2019 10:04 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Travis Wayne Vance for Packers Sanitation Services, Inc.. [19-11537] (ECF: Travis Vance) [Entered: 05/03/2019 02:14 PM] |
Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Travis Wayne Vance for Petitioner Packers Sanitation Services, Inc.. [19-11537] (ECF: Travis Vance) [Entered: 05/03/2019 02:22 PM] |
AGENCY PETITION / APPLICATION DOCKETED. Filed by Petitioner Packers Sanitation Services, Inc.. Fee Status: Fee Paid. 04/23/2019. [Entered: 04/24/2019 11:03 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.