Joseph Lane v. USA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
JOSEPH LANE |
19-11555 |
April 23, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Joseph Lane. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8794251-1] [Entered: 06/07/2019 11:38 AM] |
RETURNED UNFILED: Appellant's premature brief filed by Joseph Lane is returned unfiled because a certificate of appealability has not been granted yet. You cannot file a brief until the court tells you what issues may be discussed in the brief. Also a motion for IFP is pending which stays the briefing schedule. Please do not send a brief until a briefing schedule issues. See 11th Cir.R. 31-1(b). [Entered: 06/04/2019 10:44 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Roberta Josephina Bodnar for United States [19-11555] (ECF: Roberta Bodnar) [Entered: 05/23/2019 10:46 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Roberta Josephina Bodnar for United States. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11555] (ECF: Roberta Bodnar) [Entered: 05/23/2019 10:47 AM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida for USA. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/22/2019 03:38 PM] |
USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Joseph Lane was filed on 05/10/2019. Docket Entry 17. [Entered: 05/13/2019 08:47 AM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Joseph Lane. [Entered: 05/07/2019 02:54 PM] |
MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Joseph Lane. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8766253-1] [Entered: 05/07/2019 02:53 PM] |
USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Joseph Lane was filed on 04/30/2019. Docket Entry 15. [Entered: 05/02/2019 12:09 PM] |
USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Joseph Lane was filed on 12/20/2018. Docket Entry 9. [Entered: 04/25/2019 10:04 AM] |
HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Joseph Lane on 04/22/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 04/25/2019 10:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Joseph Lane v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: JOSEPH LANE | |
Represented By: | Joseph Lane |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.