Ansel Johnson v. Sam Culpepper, et al
| WARDEN and SAM CULPEPPER, Director |
| ANSEL WRE JOHNSON |
| 19-11565 |
| April 24, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Ansel Wre Johnson v. Samuel Culpepper, et al. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Ansel Wre Johnson failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 06/10/2019 09:38 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Ansel Wre Johnson. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/10/2019 03:25 PM] |
| Notice of filing: Disclosure Statement as to Appellant Ansel Wre Johnson. [Entered: 05/22/2019 01:05 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Ansel Wre Johnson. [Entered: 05/22/2019 01:03 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Ansel Wre Johnson on 04/22/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 04/26/2019 09:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
