Jose Rojo v. USA
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| JOSE ROJO |
| 19-11654 |
| April 25, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Jose Rojo. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8796433-1] [Entered: 06/11/2019 11:08 AM] |
| Court Reporter acknowledgment not filed. Letter issued to Court Reporter Unknown Reporter as to Appellant Jose Rojo. Transcript is due to be filed in District Court 30 days from 05/08/2019. [Entered: 06/11/2019 11:00 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Jose Rojo, Court Reporter: Unknown Reporter, Proceeding Type and Date: Telephonic Scheduling Conference 11/02/2018. [Entered: 05/09/2019 03:28 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Jose-Carlos Antonio Villanueva for Appellant Jose Rojo. Transcript(s) ordered. [19-11654] (ECF: Jose-Carlos Villanueva) [Entered: 05/08/2019 06:35 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Phillip DiRosa for USA Ariana Fajardo Orshan.. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11654] (ECF: Phillip DiRosa) [Entered: 05/08/2019 01:43 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Jose Rojo Attorney Jose-Carlos Antonio Villanueva for Appellant Jose Rojo. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11654] (ECF: Jose-Carlos Villanueva) [Entered: 05/08/2019 06:39 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Phillip DiRosa for USA [19-11654] (ECF: Phillip DiRosa) [Entered: 05/07/2019 06:08 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Emily M. Smachetti for USA. [19-11654] (ECF: Emily Smachetti) [Entered: 05/03/2019 10:29 AM] |
| CJA appointment issued by this court to Attorney Jose-Carlos Antonio Villanueva for Appellant Jose Rojo. [Entered: 05/01/2019 10:36 AM] |
| USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Jose Rojo was filed on 04/10/2019. Docket Entry 43. [Entered: 05/01/2019 10:38 AM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Jose Rojo on 04/24/2019. Fee Status: IFP Granted. [Entered: 05/01/2019 10:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jose Rojo v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Emily M. Smachetti |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida |
| Represented By: | Phillip Drew DiRosa |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: JOSE ROJO | |
| Represented By: | Jose-Carlos Antonio Villanueva |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
