James Nelson v. Florida State Prison, et al
| FLORIDA STATE PRISON, COX, SERGEANT, COKEKER, STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL |
| JAMES NELSON |
| 19-11664 |
| April 29, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant James Nelson has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court within the time fixed by the rules. [Entered: 06/10/2019 02:58 PM] |
| RETURNED UNFILED: Notice filed by James Nelson is returned unfiled because this case is closed. No further relief is available from this Court. [Entered: 06/18/2019 12:47 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant James Nelson. [Entered: 05/21/2019 04:02 PM] |
| Letter received from Appellant James Nelson in appeal designated as 3 strikes. [Entered: 05/21/2019 03:59 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to James Nelson. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/14/2019 12:52 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant James Nelson on 04/26/2019. Fee Status: PLRA 3 Strikes. [Entered: 05/01/2019 11:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
