In re: Edwin Smith
In re: EDWIN GARCIA SMITH |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
19-11738 |
May 6, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER: Motion for leave to file successive motion to vacate sentence filed by Petitioner Edwin Garcia Smith is DENIED. [ # 8766446-2 ] WHP, ELB and JEC [Entered: 05/23/2019 04:30 PM] |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. EMERGENCY Application for leave to file successive motion to vacate sentence filed by Petitioner Edwin Garcia Smith. Served 04/30/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. [Entered: 05/07/2019 03:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Edwin Smith | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: EDWIN GARCIA SMITH | |
Represented By: | Edwin Garcia Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Not yet classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.