James Young v. USA, et al
| JAMES R. YOUNG |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Solicitor General of the United States, S BETANCOURT, A.S.O.E., FNU THORNE, SIS Investigation Officer, JOHN/JANE DOE, SIS Investigation Officer and A GANNON, Education Department |
| 19-11768 |
| May 6, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for leave to proceed filed by Appellant James R. Young. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8807429-1] [Entered: 06/24/2019 10:02 AM] |
| MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant James R. Young. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8792822-1] [Entered: 06/06/2019 09:02 AM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant James R. Young. [Entered: 05/29/2019 11:02 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to James R. Young. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/23/2019 08:12 AM] |
| USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees Assessed. Filed on 05/17/2019. Docket Entry 38. [Entered: 05/20/2019 08:21 AM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant James R. Young on 05/03/2019. Fee Status: IFP Pending USDC motion Pending: Leave to Proceed (IFP) #35 05/03/2019. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 05/13/2019 09:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
