Monique Barnes v. ChildNet, et al
LESLIE SPARKS, BSO, Protective Investigator, CHILDNET, LISA JOSEPH, BSO, Protective Investigator, KENNETH MANNING, Ex-Husband and JEANETTE RANDOLPH, BSO, Protective Investigator |
MONIQUE BARNES |
19-11818 |
May 7, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Monique Barnes. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 06/06/2019 03:57 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Monique Barnes. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/23/2019 08:10 AM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Monique Barnes on 05/07/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/21/2019 as to Appellant Monique Barnes. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/04/2019 as to Appellee ChildNet [Entered: 05/15/2019 12:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.