Atlantic Specialty Insurance C, et al v. Digit Dirt Worx, Inc.
| HUTSON, INC. and ATLANTIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY |
| SERVICE |
| DIGIT DIRT WORX, INC. |
| 19-11887 |
| May 13, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company a.s.o. Hutson, Inc., et al v. Digit Dirt Worx, Inc. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Received paper copies of EAppendix filed by Appellant Digit Dirt Worx, Inc.. 2 VOLUMES - 2 COPIES [Entered: 07/02/2019 02:18 PM] |
| Received paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellant Digit Dirt Worx, Inc.. [Entered: 06/28/2019 09:28 AM] |
| Appendix filed [2 VOLUMES] by Appellant Digit Dirt Worx, Inc.. [19-11887] (ECF: David Smith) [Entered: 06/26/2019 03:44 PM] |
| Appellant's brief filed by Digit Dirt Worx, Inc.. [19-11887] (ECF: David Smith) [Entered: 06/24/2019 02:00 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by John M. Siracusa for Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company and Hutson, Inc.. [19-11887] (ECF: John Siracusa) [Entered: 06/21/2019 09:36 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Joseph W. Janssen, III for Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company and Hutson, Inc.. [19-11887] (ECF: John Siracusa) [Entered: 06/20/2019 03:01 PM] |
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney David William Smith for Appellant Digit Dirt Worx, Inc.. [Entered: 06/20/2019 09:18 AM] |
ORDER: The motion for leave to file the appellant's civil appeal statement out of time is GRANTED. (AGW) [ # 8793079-2 ] [Entered: 06/20/2019 09:11 AM]
|
| MOTION to file a Civil Appeal Statement form out of time filed by Digit Dirt Worx, Inc.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [8793079-1] [19-11887]--[Edited 06/06/2019 by JC] (ECF: David Smith) [Entered: 06/06/2019 11:03 AM] |
| Lawrence Jeffrey Roberts and David William Smith for Appellant Digit Dirt Worx, Inc. have been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required Civil Appeal Statement (CAS) and a motion to file the CAS out of time have been filed. [Entered: 06/06/2019 09:15 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11887] (ECF: David Smith) [Entered: 05/23/2019 01:57 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Lawrence Jeffrey Roberts for Digit Dirt Worx, Inc.. [19-11887] (ECF: Lawrence Roberts) [Entered: 05/22/2019 03:38 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney David William Smith for Appellant Digit Dirt Worx, Inc.. No hearings. [Entered: 05/22/2019 03:53 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by David William Smith for Digit Dirt Worx, Inc.. [19-11887] (ECF: David Smith) [Entered: 05/22/2019 05:04 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Digit Dirt Worx, Inc. on 05/10/2019. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 06/24/2019. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/28/2019 as to Appellant Digit Dirt Worx, Inc.. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/10/2019 as to Appellee Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company [Entered: 05/22/2019 03:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
