Yoldas Askan v. Faro Technologies, Inc., et al
Defendant / Appellee: FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and JOHN DOES 1 - 10
Plaintiff / Appellant: YOLDAS ASKAN
Case Number: 19-11898
Filed: May 14, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2019 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Yoldas Askan. The appellant's brief is due on or before 07/22/2019. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 07/11/2019 07:38 AM]
July 9, 2019 TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Suzanne L. Trimble, Filer: Yoldas Askan, Dt. all Trans. Filed: 06/12/2019, Proceeding Type and Date: Pre-Trial Proceedings 10/25/2018 , Pre-Trial Proceedings 01/23/2019. [Entered: 07/09/2019 04:49 PM]
July 2, 2019 AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Beverly A. Pohl for Appellee Faro Technologies, Inc.. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11898] (ECF: Beverly Pohl) [Entered: 07/02/2019 07:12 PM]
July 2, 2019 MOTION to strike Appellant's June 28, 2019 Reply Memorandum in Support of its Response to Faro Technologies' Motion to Dismiss or to Transfer to the Federal Circuit filed by Faro Technologies, Inc.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [8816185-1] [19-11898]--[Edited 07/09/2019 by RAV] (ECF: Beverly Pohl) [Entered: 07/02/2019 07:18 PM]
June 28, 2019 Reply memo in support of Response to Motion to Dism. filed by Appellant Yoldas Askan. [Entered: 07/01/2019 02:23 PM]
June 24, 2019 Reply to response filed by Appellee Faro Technologies, Inc.. [19-11898] (ECF: Beverly Pohl) [Entered: 06/24/2019 02:22 PM]
June 20, 2019 RESPONSE has been filed by Appellant Yoldas Askan to Motion to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction filed by Appellee Faro Technologies, Inc. in 19-11898 [ # 8796022-2 ]. [Entered: 06/24/2019 09:37 AM]
June 20, 2019 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Nicolette C. Vilmos for Faro Technologies, Inc.. [19-11898] (ECF: Nicolette Vilmos) [Entered: 06/20/2019 11:45 AM]
June 10, 2019 MOTION to dismiss appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction filed by Faro Technologies, Inc.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [8796022-1] [19-11898] (ECF: Beverly Pohl) [Entered: 06/10/2019 10:02 PM]
June 5, 2019 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Yoldas Askan, Court Reporter: Suzanne L. Trimble, Proceeding Type and Date: Pre-Trial Proceedings 10/25/2018 , Pre-Trial Proceedings 01/23/2019. [Entered: 06/06/2019 08:17 AM]
June 5, 2019 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Yoldas Askan. [Entered: 06/06/2019 08:13 AM]
May 31, 2019 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Beverly A. Pohl for Faro Technologies, Inc. [19-11898] (ECF: Beverly Pohl) [Entered: 05/31/2019 11:11 AM]
May 31, 2019 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Beverly A. Pohl for Faro Technologies, Inc.. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11898] (ECF: Beverly Pohl) [Entered: 05/31/2019 01:33 PM]
May 29, 2019 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Yoldas Askan. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/29/2019 08:48 AM]
May 14, 2019 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Yoldas Askan on 05/13/2019. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/28/2019 as to Appellant Yoldas Askan. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/11/2019 as to Appellee Faro Technologies, Inc. [Entered: 05/22/2019 02:32 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Yoldas Askan v. Faro Technologies, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Represented By: Nicolette Corso Vilmos
Represented By: Lloyd G. Farr
Represented By: Nicolette C. Vilmos
Represented By: Beverly A. Pohl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOHN DOES 1 - 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: YOLDAS ASKAN
Represented By: Yoldas Askan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?