Arthur Malloy v. Warden, et al
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Petitioner / Appellant: ARTHUR BRENNAN MALLOY
Case Number: 19-11964
Filed: May 20, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 7, 2019 Arthur Brennan Malloy v. Warden, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 17, 2019 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Steven Marshall for Attorney General, State of Alabama. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 07/17/2019 08:46 AM]
June 20, 2019 Appellant's brief filed by Arthur Brennan Malloy. Service date: 06/14/2019 [19-11964] Attorney for Appellee: Marshall - email. [Entered: 06/21/2019 12:34 PM]
June 18, 2019 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Steven Marshall for Attorney General, State of Alabama. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 06/18/2019 12:18 PM]
June 3, 2019 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Arthur Brennan Malloy. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [Entered: 06/04/2019 09:07 AM]
June 3, 2019 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Arthur Brennan Malloy. [Entered: 06/04/2019 09:06 AM]
May 20, 2019 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Arthur Brennan Malloy on 05/20/2019 Appellant brief due 40 days from 05/20/2019. Fee Status: IFP Granted. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 05/21/2019 02:44 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Arthur Malloy v. Warden, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: WARDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Represented By: Steven Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: ARTHUR BRENNAN MALLOY
Represented By: Arthur Brennan Malloy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?