Kenneth Frank v. Assistant State Attorney, et al
DAVID SCHOLSON, in individual capacity, ASSISTANT STATE ATTORNEY, David Schulson, BSO DETECTIVE, John Calabro, DAVID P. ZWICK, in individual capacity and JOHN CALABRO, in individual capacity |
KENNETH A. FRANK |
19-12106 |
May 30, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees Assessed. Filed on 06/24/2019. Docket Entry 28. [Entered: 07/24/2019 01:01 PM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Kenneth A. Frank. [Entered: 07/19/2019 04:57 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Kenneth A. Frank. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 07/03/2019 03:31 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Kenneth A. Frank. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 06/18/2019 11:51 AM] |
PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Kenneth A. Frank on 05/24/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 06/03/2019 11:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.