Eulalia Andres-Diego, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
| MAGDALENA ROSALINDA DE DIEGO-ANDRES, EULALIA ANDRES-DIEGO and ANGELINA DE DIEGO-ANDRES |
| U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 19-12190 |
| June 7, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Eulalia Andres-Diego, et al v. U.S. Attorney General |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Erik R. Quick for Respondent U.S. Attorney General. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-12190] (ECF: Erik Quick) [Entered: 06/11/2019 08:14 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Erik R. Quick OIL for U.S. Attorney General. [19-12190] (ECF: Erik Quick) [Entered: 06/10/2019 01:43 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Attorney Edward F. O'Connor for Petitioner Magdalena Rosalinda De Diego-Andres in 19-12190, Attorney Edward F. O'Connor for Petitioner Angelina De Diego-Andres in 19-12190, Attorney Edward F. O'Connor for Petitioner Eulalia Andres-Diego in 19-12190. [Entered: 06/10/2019 08:36 AM] |
| AGENCY PETITION / APPLICATION DOCKETED. Filed by Petitioners Eulalia Andres-Diego, Angelina De Diego-Andres and Magdalena Rosalinda De Diego-Andres. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.--[Edited 06/12/2019 by SCW to correct fee status] [Entered: 06/10/2019 08:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
