Lawton Adkins v. Florida Attorney General, et al
Respondent / Appellee: FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant: LAWTON CALVIN ADKINS
Case Number: 19-12425
Filed: June 25, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2019 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Lawton Calvin Adkins. [Entered: 08/09/2019 09:33 AM]
August 1, 2019 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Lawton Calvin Adkins. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8848717-1] [Entered: 08/09/2019 09:39 AM]
August 1, 2019 MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Lawton Calvin Adkins. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8848723-1] [Entered: 08/09/2019 09:43 AM]
July 23, 2019 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Lawton Calvin Adkins. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 07/23/2019 04:10 PM]
July 17, 2019 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Bryan G. Jordan for Appellee. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-12425] (ECF: Bryan Jordan) [Entered: 07/17/2019 11:37 AM]
July 17, 2019 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Bryan G. Jordan for Appellee [19-12425] (ECF: Bryan Jordan) [Entered: 07/17/2019 11:07 AM]
June 25, 2019 USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Lawton Calvin Adkins was filed on 08/16/2017. Docket Entry 50. [Entered: 06/27/2019 10:22 AM]
June 25, 2019 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Lawton Calvin Adkins on 06/21/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 06/27/2019 10:11 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lawton Adkins v. Florida Attorney General, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Trisha Meggs Pate
Represented By: Ashley Moody
Represented By: Jennifer Johnson Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Ashley Moody
Represented By: Jennifer Johnson Moore
Represented By: Bryan G. Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: LAWTON CALVIN ADKINS
Represented By: Lawton Calvin Adkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?