Dennis Williams v. USA
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| DENNIS GRAY WILLIAMS |
| 19-12430 |
| June 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice of filing Prisoner Financial Statement as to appellant. [Entered: 08/19/2019 11:28 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michelle Thresher Taylor for United States of America [19-12430] (ECF: Michelle Taylor) [Entered: 08/13/2019 10:57 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Michelle Thresher Taylor for United States of America. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-12430] (ECF: Michelle Taylor) [Entered: 08/13/2019 10:59 AM] |
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Dennis Gray Williams. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8838871-1] [Entered: 07/30/2019 10:52 AM] |
| MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Dennis Gray Williams. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8838734-1] [Entered: 07/30/2019 10:14 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida for USA. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 07/26/2019 12:43 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Dennis Gray Williams. [Entered: 07/29/2019 12:37 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Dennis Gray Williams. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 07/17/2019 09:39 AM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Dennis Gray Williams on 06/26/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 06/27/2019 11:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Dennis Williams v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida |
| Represented By: | Michelle Thresher Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: DENNIS GRAY WILLIAMS | |
| Represented By: | Dennis Gray Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
