Robert Clark v. Chiquita Fye, et al
ROBERT L. CLARK |
CHIQUITA A. FYE, in her official and individual capacity as Medical Director of Macon State Prison and GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, Macon State Prison |
19-12928 |
August 1, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Appeal clerically reinstated as to Appellant Robert L. Clark because appeal was erroneously dismissed on 08/26/2019. The Motion for Imminent Danger filed.. [Entered: 09/13/2019 09:49 AM] |
Letter received from Appellant Robert L. Clark in appeal designated as 3 strikes. [Entered: 08/30/2019 09:31 AM] |
ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Robert L. Clark failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 08/26/2019 08:02 AM] |
RETURNED UNFILED: Request for COA filed by Robert L. Clark is returned unfiled because a Certificate of Appealability is not required in this appeal. Per the August 8, 2019, DKT-4 Three Strikes letter, this appeal cannot proceed until the full docketing and filing fees ($505) are paid to the United States District Court. [Entered: 08/15/2019 03:00 PM] |
PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Robert L. Clark on 08/01/2019. Fee Status: PLRA 3 Strikes. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 08/08/2019 09:48 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.