USA v. Mark Ford
| MARK RAYMOND FORD |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-13100 |
| August 13, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Mark Raymond Ford on 08/12/2019. Fee Status: IFP Granted. USDC motion pending: Motion to Relieve Appointed Counsel & Appoint New Counsel. #484 filed on 08/14/2019. [Entered: 08/22/2019 10:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Mark Ford | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: MARK RAYMOND FORD | |
| Represented By: | Donna Lee Elm |
| Represented By: | Adam Paul Labonte |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
