Arturo Hernandez-Esquivel v. USA
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| ARTURO HERNANDEZ-ESQUIVEL |
| 19-13314 |
| August 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Arturo Hernandez-Esquivel. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8899088-1] [Entered: 10/04/2019 05:44 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Arturo Hernandez-Esquivel. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 09/26/2019 11:58 AM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Arturo Hernandez-Esquivel. [Entered: 09/30/2019 04:44 PM] |
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Arturo Hernandez-Esquivel. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8881779-1] [Entered: 09/17/2019 10:58 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Arturo Hernandez-Esquivel. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 09/11/2019 09:48 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Mr. Scott Alan Gray for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-13314] (ECF: Scott Gray) [Entered: 09/05/2019 03:37 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Scott Gray for USA U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Alabama for USA. [19-13314] (ECF: Scott Gray) [Entered: 09/04/2019 10:56 AM] |
| USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Arturo Hernandez-Esquivel was filed on 07/29/2019. Docket Entry 55. [Entered: 08/30/2019 11:22 AM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Arturo Hernandez-Esquivel on 08/26/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 08/30/2019 11:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Arturo Hernandez-Esquivel v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Scott Alan Gray |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Alabama |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: ARTURO HERNANDEZ-ESQUIVEL | |
| Represented By: | Arturo Hernandez-Esquivel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
