Susanne Helbig v. USA, et al
| U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, ORLANDO COLON-AVILES, DDS Staff Dentist, WARDEN, DIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and REGIONAL DIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS SE REGIONS |
| SUSANNE D. HELBIG |
| 19-13525 |
| September 9, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Susanne D. Helbig was filed on 10/11/2019. Docket Entry 20. [Entered: 11/05/2019 02:10 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Susanne D. Helbig. [Entered: 11/05/2019 02:19 PM] |
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Susanne D. Helbig. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8925136-1] [Entered: 11/05/2019 02:15 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Susanne D. Helbig. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 10/03/2019 12:09 PM] |
| USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Susanne D. Helbig was filed on 08/22/2019. Docket Entry 13. [Entered: 09/11/2019 12:31 PM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Susanne D. Helbig on 09/09/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 09/11/2019 11:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
