Sarah Garza v. Carnival Corporation, et al
STEINER TRANSOCEAN U.S., INC., STEINER LEISURE LIMITED, CARNIVAL CORPORATION and STEINER TRANSOCEAN LIMITED |
SARAH GARZA |
19-13727 |
September 20, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER: Motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Appellant Sarah Garza is GRANTED by clerk. [ # 8926768-2 ] [Entered: 11/07/2019 11:08 AM] |
ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to Appellant Sarah Garza's motion for voluntary dismissal, FRAP Rule 42 and 11th Cir. R. 42-1(a), the above referenced appeal was duly entered dismissed on this date [Entered: 11/07/2019 11:10 AM] |
MOTION to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Sarah Garza. Joint Stipulation of Parties. [8926768-1] [19-13727] (ECF: Luis Perez) [Entered: 11/06/2019 05:00 PM] |
JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Sarah Garza. [Entered: 10/23/2019 01:24 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jason Margulies for Sara Garza Jason Robert Margulies for Sarah Garza. [19-13727] (ECF: Jason Margulies) [Entered: 10/15/2019 01:26 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jacqueline Garcell for Sara Garza Jacqueline Garcell for Sarah Garza. [19-13727] (ECF: Jacqueline Garcell) [Entered: 10/15/2019 01:00 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michael Winkleman for Sara Garza Michael A. Winkleman for Sarah Garza. [19-13727] (ECF: Michael Winkleman) [Entered: 10/15/2019 02:03 PM] |
Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Sarah Garza. The appellant's brief is due on or before 10/30/2019. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 10/04/2019 05:12 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Luis Alexander Perez for Appellant Sarah Garza. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 10/04/2019 11:53 AM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Luis Alexander Perez for Appellant Sarah Garza. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [19-13727] (ECF: Luis Perez) [Entered: 10/03/2019 04:00 PM] |
Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Luis Alexander Perez for Appellant Sarah Garza. [19-13727] (ECF: Luis Perez) [Entered: 10/03/2019 03:55 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by L. Alex Perez for Sara Garza [19-13727] (ECF: Luis Perez) [Entered: 10/02/2019 03:51 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by L. Alex Perez for Sara Garza. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-13727] (ECF: Luis Perez) [Entered: 10/02/2019 03:55 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Cameron Wayne Eubanks for CCL. [19-13727] (ECF: Cameron Eubanks) [Entered: 09/26/2019 02:53 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Cameron Wayne Eubanks for Appellee CCL. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-13727] (ECF: Cameron Eubanks) [Entered: 09/26/2019 04:00 PM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Sarah Garza on 09/20/2019. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/04/2019 as to Appellant Sarah Garza. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/18/2019 as to Appellee Carnival Corporation [Entered: 09/26/2019 09:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.