Joe Scott, III v. Maria Landy, et al
| MARIA LANDY, Police Officer and DAVID GONZALEZ, III |
| JOE HENRY SCOTT, III |
| 19-13777 |
| September 23, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: On its own motion, the court DISMISSES the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. BBM, JP and BCG [Entered: 11/05/2019 07:11 AM]
|
| RETURNED UNFILED: Motion to proceed IFP filed by Joe Henry Scott, III is returned unfiled because the appeal has been dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. [Entered: 11/05/2019 07:37 AM] |
| USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Joe Henry Scott, III was filed on 10/10/2019. Docket Entry 19. [Entered: 10/11/2019 07:48 AM] |
| RETURNED UNFILED: Certificate of Interested Persons filed by Joe Henry Scott, III is returned unfiled because it is not filled out correctly. [Entered: 10/08/2019 10:52 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Joe Henry Scott, III. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 10/08/2019 08:52 AM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Joe Henry Scott, III on 09/23/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/07/2019 as to Appellant Joe Henry Scott III [Entered: 09/25/2019 12:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
