Vantice Beshears, Jr. v. Board of County Commissioners, et al
JUSTIN BROWN, WILLIAM WOOD, WILLIAM ARIAS, RODNEY WOODSON and BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS |
VANTICE LEE BESHEARS, JR. |
19-13925 |
October 3, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MOTION for IFP construed as motion for leave to proceed filed by Appellant Vantice Lee Beshears, Jr.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8942629-1] [Entered: 11/26/2019 10:38 AM] |
USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees Assessed. Filed on 11/06/2019. Docket Entry 17. [Entered: 11/08/2019 10:51 AM] |
Notice of filing Prisoner Financial Statement as to appellant. [Entered: 11/04/2019 04:36 PM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Vantice Lee Beshears, Jr.. [Entered: 10/29/2019 09:16 AM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Vantice Lee Beshears, Jr.. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 10/18/2019 12:05 PM] |
PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Vantice Lee Beshears, Jr. on 10/03/2019. Fee Status: IFP Pending USDC motion Pending: Motion for IFP, DE # 15 10/03/2019. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 10/08/2019 12:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.