Richard Washington v. T. Yardely, et al
| T. YARDELY, A. MOLINA, ISERMAN and DITTERLINE |
| RICHARD ALFRED WASHINGTON |
| 19-13945 |
| October 4, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Richard Alfred Washington failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 11/05/2019 11:56 AM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Richard Alfred Washington. [Entered: 10/28/2019 06:43 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Jeffery R. Lawley for Appellees Ditterline, Iserman and T. Yardely. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-13945] (ECF: Jeffery Lawley) [Entered: 10/25/2019 05:05 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jeffery R. Lawley for: Thomasyane Yardley, James Ditterline and Jordon Isserman [19-13945] (ECF: Jeffery Lawley) [Entered: 10/18/2019 03:41 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Richard Alfred Washington on 09/26/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 10/09/2019 11:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
