Rochelle Driessen v. University of Miami School of, et al
| ROCHELLE Y. DRIESSEN |
| UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF LAW CHILDREN AND YOUTH CLINIC and EMILY C. MOISES DAY TRAINING CENTER |
| 19-14225 |
| October 24, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice of Change of Address for Party Rochelle Y. Driessen. [Entered: 12/20/2019 11:01 AM] |
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Rochelle Y. Driessen. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8964226-1] [Entered: 12/20/2019 11:05 AM] |
| USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Rochelle Y. Driessen was filed on 10/28/2019. Docket Entry 16. [Entered: 11/26/2019 03:27 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Rochelle Y. Driessen. [Entered: 11/18/2019 04:27 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Rochelle Y. Driessen. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 11/08/2019 11:11 AM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Rochelle Y. Driessen on 10/24/2019. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: Motion for IFP, DE # 15. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/07/2019 as to Appellant Rochelle Y. Driessen [Entered: 10/28/2019 11:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
