Ray Jefferson Cromartie v. Bradfield Shealy, et al
BRADFIELD SHEALY, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDA WHARTON and GDCP WARDEN |
RAY JEFFERSON CROMARTIE |
19-14268 |
October 29, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Mandate issued as to Appellant Ray Jefferson Cromartie. [Entered: 11/18/2019 11:22 AM] |
Writ of Certiorari filed as to Appellant Ray Jefferson Cromartie is DENIED. SC# 19-6570. The Court's mandate will issue shortly. [Entered: 11/14/2019 04:41 PM] |
Notice of Writ of Certiorari filed as to Appellant Ray Jefferson Cromartie. SC# 19-6570. [Entered: 11/14/2019 04:39 PM] |
Notice of Writ of Certiorari filed as to Appellant Ray Jefferson Cromartie. SC# 19-6570. [Entered: 11/15/2019 04:34 PM] |
Supplemental Authority filed by Appellant Ray Jefferson Cromartie. [19-14268] (ECF: Aren Adjoian) [Entered: 11/08/2019 02:44 PM] |
ORDER: The Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED, no judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc. (FRAP 35) The Petition for Panel Rehearing is also denied. (FRAP 40) filed by Appellant Ray Jefferson Cromartie. [8928977-1] [Entered: 11/08/2019 03:53 PM] |
ORDER: Renewed Motion for stay of execution filed by Appellant Ray Jefferson Cromartie is DENIED. [ # 8926451-2 ] EEC, BBM and RSR [Entered: 11/08/2019 03:56 PM] |
RESPONSE to Motion to stay execution filed by Appellant Ray Jefferson Cromartie [ # 8926451-2 ] filed by Attorney Sabrina Graham for Appellees Georgia Department of Corrections, Bradfield Shealy, GDCP Warden and Randa Wharton. [19-14268] (ECF: Sabrina Graham) [Entered: 11/07/2019 11:23 AM] |
TIME SENSITIVE MOTION to stay execution filed by Ray Jefferson Cromartie. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [8926451-1] [19-14268] (ECF: Aren Adjoian) [Entered: 11/06/2019 03:10 PM] |
Petition for rehearing en banc (with panel rehearing) filed by Appellant Ray Jefferson Cromartie. [19-14268] (ECF: Aren Adjoian) [Entered: 11/06/2019 03:00 PM] |
Judgment entered as to Appellant Ray Jefferson Cromartie. [Entered: 10/30/2019 12:24 PM] |
Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Ray Jefferson Cromartie. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Published. Opinion method: Signed. Motion to stay execution filed by Appellant Ray Jefferson Cromartie is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 8919496-2 ]. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link # http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions . [Entered: 10/30/2019 12:22 PM] |
NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES - This Court directs Appellant's counsel to file all necessary documents by 2:00 p.m. ET today. The Court also directs Appellees' counsel to file all documents in response by 5:00 p.m ET today. [Entered: 10/29/2019 11:34 AM] |
USDC order granting IFP as to Appellant Ray Jefferson Cromartie was filed on 10/29/2019. Docket Entry 12. [Entered: 10/29/2019 09:36 AM] |
Appellant's brief filed by Ray Jefferson Cromartie. [19-14268] (ECF: Aren Adjoian) [Entered: 10/29/2019 01:59 PM] |
Appellee's Brief filed by Appellee GDCP Warden. [19-14268] (ECF: Sabrina Graham) [Entered: 10/29/2019 04:53 PM] |
Reply Brief filed by Appellant Ray Jefferson Cromartie. [19-14268] (ECF: Aren Adjoian) [Entered: 10/29/2019 06:07 PM] |
DEATH PENALTY APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Aren K. Adjoian and Eric John Montroy for Appellant Ray Jefferson Cromartie on 10/29/2019. Appellant brief due 40 days from 10/29/2019. Fee Status: IFP Granted. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 10/29/2019 09:30 AM] |
EMERGENCY MOTION to stay execution filed by Ray Jefferson Cromartie. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [8919496-1] [19-14268] (ECF: Aren Adjoian) [Entered: 10/29/2019 02:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.