Daniel Cobble v. Cobb County District Attorney, et al
| DANIEL ERIC COBBLE |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, includes all GA District Judges, SUMTER COUNTY SHERIFF, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA, COBB COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 19-14342 |
| October 31, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Daniel Eric Cobble. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8962022-1] [Entered: 12/18/2019 01:56 PM] |
| This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is filed in this Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 12/05/2019 08:06 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Brett Joseph Talley for USA and U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Alabama for USA. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 12/02/2019 01:43 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Brett Joseph Talley for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-14342] (ECF: Brett Talley) [Entered: 12/02/2019 03:53 PM] |
| Notice of filing: Notice of More Evidence as to Appellant Daniel Eric Cobble. [Entered: 11/27/2019 08:25 AM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Daniel Eric Cobble. [Entered: 11/25/2019 02:56 PM] |
| MOTION for clerk to file all motions as future brief filed by Appellant Daniel Eric Cobble. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8941831-1] [Entered: 11/25/2019 02:53 PM] |
| MOTION Illegible Motion filed by Appellant Daniel Eric Cobble. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8941825-1] [Entered: 11/25/2019 02:51 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Brett J. Talley for USA [19-14342] (ECF: Brett Talley) [Entered: 11/18/2019 04:34 PM] |
| MOTION Motion for U.S. Court of Appeals to Rule filed by Appellant Daniel Eric Cobble. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8941769-1] [Entered: 11/25/2019 02:34 PM] |
| MOTION for attorney's fees or costs filed by Appellant Daniel Eric Cobble. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8941780-1] [Entered: 11/25/2019 02:40 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Daniel Eric Cobble. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 11/15/2019 07:45 AM] |
| USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Daniel Eric Cobble was filed on 10/31/2019. Docket Entry 7. [Entered: 10/31/2019 02:56 PM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Daniel Eric Cobble on 10/21/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 10/31/2019 02:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
