Mahad Dini v. Etowah County Jail Warden, et al
| WILLIAM BARR and ETOWAH COUNTY JAIL WARDEN |
| MAHAD ABDI DINI |
| 19-14351 |
| October 29, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Abigail E. Leach Abigail Evelyn Leach for William Barr. [19-14351] (ECF: Abigail Leach) [Entered: 12/13/2019 08:35 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Mahad Abdi Dini. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 12/13/2019 08:54 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Anthon C. Payne Anthony Cardozo Payne for William Barr. [19-14351] (ECF: Anthony Payne) [Entered: 12/11/2019 09:04 AM] |
| Public Communication: Anthony Cardozo Payne - The clerk may not process filings from an attorney until that attorney files an appearance form. See 11th Cir. R. 46-6. Appearance of counsel forms are available on the court's website www.ca11.uscourts.gov. [Entered: 12/10/2019 03:22 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Abigail E. Leach for USA Attorney Anthony Cardozo Payne for Appellee William Barr. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-14351] (ECF: Anthony Payne) [Entered: 12/10/2019 02:57 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Abigail Evelyn Leach for William Barr, Anthony Cardozo Payne for William Barr and U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Alabama for William Barr. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 12/05/2019 01:43 PM] |
| USDC order granting IFP as to Appellant Mahad Abdi Dini was filed on 12/02/2019. Docket Entry 22. [Entered: 12/05/2019 01:45 PM] |
| Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Mahad Abdi Dini. The appellant's brief is due on or before 01/13/2020. [Entered: 12/05/2019 02:26 PM] |
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Mahad Abdi Dini. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8941409-1] [Entered: 11/25/2019 11:26 AM] |
| USDC order directing appellant to file IFP form or Statement of Prison Account as to Appellant Mahad Abdi Dini was filed on 11/08/2019. Docket Entry 20. [Entered: 11/14/2019 11:09 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Mahad Abdi Dini. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 11/14/2019 11:11 AM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Mahad Abdi Dini on 10/28/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 11/04/2019 09:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
