Quentin Hill v. Clinton Perry
Respondent / Appellee: CLINTON PERRY
Petitioner / Appellant: QUENTIN M. HILL
Case Number: 19-14579
Filed: November 14, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2019 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Meghan Hobbs Hill for Appellee Clinton Perry. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-14579] (ECF: Meghan Hill) [Entered: 12/16/2019 10:29 AM]
December 13, 2019 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Christopher Michael Carr for Clinton Perry, Meghan Hobbs Hill for Clinton Perry and Paula Khristian Smith for Clinton Perry. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 12/13/2019 08:37 AM]
December 13, 2019 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Meghan Hobbs Hill for Clinton Perry. [19-14579] (ECF: Meghan Hill) [Entered: 12/13/2019 03:53 PM]
December 10, 2019 USDC MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellant Quentin M. Hill was filed on 11/26/2019. Docket Entry 33. [Entered: 12/10/2019 08:25 AM]
December 9, 2019 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Quentin M. Hill. [Entered: 12/10/2019 10:16 AM]
December 2, 2019 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Quentin M. Hill. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 12/02/2019 12:43 PM]
November 20, 2019 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Quentin M. Hill was filed on 10/22/2019. Docket Entry 27. [Entered: 11/20/2019 07:28 AM]
November 14, 2019 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Quentin M. Hill on 11/12/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 11/20/2019 07:24 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Quentin Hill v. Clinton Perry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: CLINTON PERRY
Represented By: Meghan Hobbs Hill
Represented By: Paula Khristian Smith
Represented By: Christopher Michael Carr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: QUENTIN M. HILL
Represented By: Quentin M. Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?