Reginald Johnson, II v. Commissioner, Georgia Dept
Defendant / Appellee: COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES
Plaintiff / Appellant: REGINALD V. JOHNSON, II
Case Number: 19-14590
Filed: November 18, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2019 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Shalen S. Nelson, Counsel for Appellee, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-14590] (ECF: Shalen Nelson) [Entered: 12/19/2019 04:41 PM]
December 18, 2019 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Kelly Elizabeth Campanella for Commissioner, Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities and Shalen S. Nelson for Commissioner, Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 12/18/2019 04:15 PM]
December 4, 2019 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Reginald V. Johnson, II. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 12/04/2019 04:19 PM]
November 18, 2019 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Reginald V. Johnson, II on 11/18/2019. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: Motion to proceed IFP. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 12/02/2019 as to Appellant Reginald V. Johnson II. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 12/16/2019 as to Appellee Commissioner, Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities [Entered: 11/20/2019 01:18 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Reginald Johnson, II v. Commissioner, Georgia Dept
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES
Represented By: Shalen S. Nelson
Represented By: Kelly Elizabeth Campanella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: REGINALD V. JOHNSON, II
Represented By: Reginald V. Johnson II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?