Charles Alpine v. Warden, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHARLES ALPINE
Defendant / Appellee: WARDEN and SCOTT S. HARRIS
Case Number: 19-14600
Filed: November 18, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2020 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Charles Alpine. [Entered: 01/14/2020 01:12 PM]
December 11, 2019 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Charles Alpine. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 12/11/2019 12:59 PM]
December 9, 2019 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal construed from appellants consent form filed by Appellant Charles Alpine. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8955209-1] [Entered: 12/11/2019 01:33 PM]
December 9, 2019 Consent Form filed by Appellant Charles Alpine. [Entered: 12/11/2019 01:25 PM]
December 9, 2019 Notice of filing: Request for application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellant Charles Alpine, not required. [Entered: 12/11/2019 01:17 PM]
December 9, 2019 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. [Entered: 12/11/2019 01:11 PM]
December 5, 2019 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Emily M. Smachetti for USA Ariana Fajardo Orshan.. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-14600] (ECF: Emily Smachetti) [Entered: 12/05/2019 02:19 PM]
November 21, 2019 USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 10/22/2019. Docket Entry 4. [Entered: 11/21/2019 11:25 AM]
November 18, 2019 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Charles Alpine on 11/18/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 11/21/2019 11:23 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Charles Alpine v. Warden, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CHARLES ALPINE
Represented By: Warden, James V. All Red Unit CI
Represented By: Charles Alpine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WARDEN
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida
Represented By: Emily M. Smachetti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SCOTT S. HARRIS
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida
Represented By: Emily M. Smachetti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?