Jose Vazquez v. USA
| JOSE CARLOS POLANCO VAZQUEZ |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-14693 |
| November 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant Jose Carlos Polanco Vazquez. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8983290-1] [Entered: 01/15/2020 02:30 PM] |
| Notice of filing Prisoner Financial Statement as to appellant. [Entered: 01/15/2020 02:27 PM] |
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Jose Carlos Polanco Vazquez failed to file a Prisoner Financial Statement within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 01/07/2020 09:34 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida for USA. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 12/26/2019 02:07 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file a Motion for Certificate of Appealability to 01/25/2020 filed by Appellant Jose Carlos Polanco Vazquez. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8966601-1] [Entered: 12/26/2019 10:11 AM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Jose Carlos Polanco Vazquez. [Entered: 12/26/2019 10:04 AM] |
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Jose Carlos Polanco Vazquez. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8959909-1] [Entered: 12/17/2019 08:49 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Jose Carlos Polanco Vazquez. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 12/11/2019 08:15 AM] |
| USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Jose Carlos Polanco Vazquez was filed on 09/10/2019. Docket Entry 16. [Entered: 11/26/2019 02:27 PM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Jose Carlos Polanco Vazquez on 11/25/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 11/26/2019 02:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jose Vazquez v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: JOSE CARLOS POLANCO VAZQUEZ | |
| Represented By: | Jose Carlos Polanco Vazquez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
