Daniel Cobble v. U.S. Government, et al
| GEORGIA DISTRICT COURT and U.S. GOVERNMENT |
| DANIEL ERIC COBBLE |
| 19-14763 |
| November 27, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Daniel Eric Cobble. [Entered: 01/22/2020 11:17 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Brett J. Talley for USA. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-14763] (ECF: Brett Talley) [Entered: 01/02/2020 09:34 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Brett J. Talley for USA [19-14763] (ECF: Brett Talley) [Entered: 01/02/2020 11:13 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Brett Joseph Talley for U.S. Government and Georgia District Court. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 01/02/2020 11:28 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Daniel Eric Cobble. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 12/31/2019 03:47 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Alabama for U.S. Government and Georgia District Court. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 12/31/2019 03:46 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Daniel Eric Cobble. [Entered: 01/02/2020 02:50 PM] |
| The briefing schedule issued to Appellant Daniel Eric Cobble is hereby rescinded for the following reason(s): COA is required. When the above matter(s) is resolved, the clerk will issue a notice advising counsel and the parties of the new schedule for filing briefs in this appeal. [Entered: 12/17/2019 04:51 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Daniel Eric Cobble. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 12/13/2019 04:43 PM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Daniel Eric Cobble on 11/25/2019 Appellant brief due 40 days from 11/27/2019. Fee Status: IFP Granted. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 12/04/2019 09:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
