Marquise Robbins v. Warden, et al
| ALISA EVANS, Dep. Warden of Care & Treatment, PARKER, AEP Supervisor, BOYD, Food Director, JOSHUA JONES, Unit Manager and WARDEN |
| MARQUISE ROBBINS |
| 19-14911 |
| December 5, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Consent Form filed by Appellant Marquise Robbins. [Entered: 01/21/2020 09:56 AM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed filed by Appellant Marquise Robbins. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8986536-1] [Entered: 01/21/2020 09:59 AM] |
| USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 01/03/2020. Docket Entry 12. [Entered: 01/07/2020 07:47 AM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Marquise Robbins. [Entered: 12/31/2019 07:15 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Marquise Robbins. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 12/26/2019 11:30 AM] |
| USDC Motion filed by appellant for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees or consent form. Filed on 12/02/2019. Docket Entry 8. [Entered: 12/11/2019 12:21 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Marquise Robbins on 12/02/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid 12/02/2019. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 12/11/2019 12:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
